Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Hanford
This post compares Selma, California to Hanford, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Hanford (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 55,599 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $42,984 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $192,900 |
| White | 78% | 75% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 54% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 41% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Hanford?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Hanford: 24537 compared with 55599 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Hanford?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Hanford?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Hanford does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 43% for Hanford.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z