Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Foothill Farms
This post compares Selma, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 78% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 54% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 41% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Foothill Farms?
A: Selma has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 24537 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z