Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Eureka
This post compares Selma, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $249,300 |
| White | 78% | 75% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 54% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 37 |
| Rentals | 41% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Eureka?
A: Selma has a similar population count than Eureka: 24537 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z