Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares Selma, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $154,600 |
| White | 78% | 70% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 54% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 41% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Selma has a similar population count than Desert Hot Springs: 24537 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z