Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Corona
This post compares Selma, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Selma (city) | Corona (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,537 | 163,585 |
Income (median) | $35,716 | $50,094 |
Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $411,600 |
White | 78% | 66% |
Black | 0% | 5% |
Asian | 4% | 11% |
With Kids | 54% | 40% |
Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
Rentals | 41% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Corona?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Corona: 24537 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z