Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Chico
This post compares Selma, California to Chico, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Chico (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 90,660 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $43,253 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $286,700 |
| White | 78% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 54% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 29 |
| Rentals | 41% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Chico?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Chico: 24537 compared with 90660 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Chico?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Chico?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chico does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 55% for Chico.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z