Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Burbank
This post compares Selma, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $574,300 |
| White | 78% | 70% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 54% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 41% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Burbank?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 24537 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z