Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Beverly Hills
This post compares Selma, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 78% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 9% |
| With Kids | 54% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 41% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Beverly Hills?
A: Selma has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 24537 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z