Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Bellflower
This post compares Selma, California to Bellflower, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Bellflower (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 77,852 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $40,092 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $398,000 |
| White | 78% | 32% |
| Black | 0% | 13% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 54% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 41% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Bellflower?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Bellflower: 24537 compared with 77852 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Bellflower?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Bellflower?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bellflower does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 60% for Bellflower.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z