Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Bell
This post compares Selma, California to Bell, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Bell (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 35,942 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $28,916 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $352,000 |
| White | 78% | 75% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 54% | 53% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 30 |
| Rentals | 41% | 70% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Bell?
A: Selma has a smaller population count than Bell: 24537 compared with 35942 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Bell?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Bell?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bell does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 70% for Bell.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z