Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Baldwin Park
This post compares Selma, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $357,500 |
| White | 78% | 34% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 18% |
| With Kids | 54% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 41% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Baldwin Park?
A: Selma has a much smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 24537 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z