Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Azusa
This post compares Selma, California to Azusa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Azusa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 49,029 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $36,825 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $367,500 |
| White | 78% | 45% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 12% |
| With Kids | 54% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 29 |
| Rentals | 41% | 47% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Azusa?
A: Selma has a smaller population count than Azusa: 24537 compared with 49029 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Azusa?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Azusa?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Azusa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Selma versus 47% for Azusa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z