Compare-Cities.com
Compare Selma to Altadena
This post compares Selma, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Selma (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,537 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $35,716 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $649,800 |
| White | 78% | 53% |
| Black | 0% | 22% |
| Asian | 4% | 6% |
| With Kids | 54% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 41% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Selma or Altadena?
A: Selma has a smaller population count than Altadena: 24537 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Selma or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Selma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Selma or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Selma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Selma versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Selma may include: Sanger, Porterville, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z