Compare-Cities.com
Compare Seal Beach to South San Francisco
This post compares Seal Beach, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Seal Beach (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,510 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $76,405 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $338,100 | $697,400 |
| White | 80% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 10% | 39% |
| With Kids | 13% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 58 | 39 |
| Rentals | 24% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Seal Beach or South San Francisco?
A: Seal Beach has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 24510 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Seal Beach or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Seal Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Seal Beach or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Seal Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Seal Beach versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Seal Beach may include: Palm-Springs, Palm-Desert, and Walnut-Creek.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z