Compare-Cities.com
Compare Saratoga to South Pasadena
This post compares Saratoga, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Saratoga (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,013 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $145,368 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $1,933,900 | $928,500 |
White | 48% | 54% |
Black | 0% | 3% |
Asian | 46% | 29% |
With Kids | 35% | 34% |
Age (median) | 49 | 40 |
Rentals | 15% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Saratoga or South Pasadena?
A: Saratoga has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 31013 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Saratoga or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Saratoga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Saratoga or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Saratoga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 15% for Saratoga versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Saratoga may include: Palo-Alto, La-Caada-Flintridge, and Cupertino.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z