Compare-Cities.com
Compare Saratoga to San Bruno
This post compares Saratoga, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Saratoga (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,013 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $145,368 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,933,900 | $754,700 |
| White | 48% | 49% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 46% | 28% |
| With Kids | 35% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 49 | 39 |
| Rentals | 15% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Saratoga or San Bruno?
A: Saratoga has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 31013 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Saratoga or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Saratoga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Saratoga or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Saratoga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 15% for Saratoga versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Saratoga may include: Palo-Alto, La-Caada-Flintridge, and Cupertino.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z