Compare-Cities.com
Compare Saratoga to Riverbank
This post compares Saratoga, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Saratoga (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,013 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $145,368 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,933,900 | $247,200 |
| White | 48% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 46% | 4% |
| With Kids | 35% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 49 | 32 |
| Rentals | 15% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Saratoga or Riverbank?
A: Saratoga has a larger population count than Riverbank: 31013 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Saratoga or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Saratoga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Saratoga or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Saratoga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 15% for Saratoga versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Saratoga may include: Palo-Alto, La-Caada-Flintridge, and Cupertino.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z