Compare-Cities.com
Compare Saratoga to Palm Springs
This post compares Saratoga, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Saratoga (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,013 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $145,368 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,933,900 | $340,600 |
| White | 48% | 83% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 46% | 4% |
| With Kids | 35% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 49 | 54 |
| Rentals | 15% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Saratoga or Palm Springs?
A: Saratoga has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 31013 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Saratoga or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Saratoga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Saratoga or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Saratoga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 15% for Saratoga versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Saratoga may include: Palo-Alto, La-Caada-Flintridge, and Cupertino.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z