Compare-Cities.com
Compare Saratoga to Lake Forest
This post compares Saratoga, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Saratoga (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,013 | 81,812 |
| Income (median) | $145,368 | $64,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,933,900 | $585,100 |
| White | 48% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 46% | 15% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 49 | 39 |
| Rentals | 15% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Saratoga or Lake Forest?
A: Saratoga has a much smaller population count than Lake Forest: 31013 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Saratoga or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Saratoga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Saratoga or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Saratoga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lake Forest does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 15% for Saratoga versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Saratoga may include: Palo-Alto, La-Caada-Flintridge, and Cupertino.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z