Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Rosa to South San Francisco
This post compares Santa Rosa, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Rosa (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,244 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $48,146 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $458,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 68% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 5% | 39% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Rosa or South San Francisco?
A: Santa Rosa has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 174244 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Rosa or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Santa Rosa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Rosa or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Santa Rosa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Rosa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Santa Rosa versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Rosa may include: Oceanside, Upland, and Concord.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z