Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Paula to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Santa Paula, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Paula (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,344 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $36,718 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $322,800 |
| White | 85% | 36% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 10% |
| With Kids | 43% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Paula or South San Jose Hills?
A: Santa Paula has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 30344 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Paula or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Santa Paula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Paula or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Santa Paula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Paula does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Santa Paula versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Paula may include: Brawley, Oakdale, and Calexico.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z