Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Paula to South San Francisco
This post compares Santa Paula, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Paula (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,344 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $36,718 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 85% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 39% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Paula or South San Francisco?
A: Santa Paula has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 30344 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Paula or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Santa Paula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Paula or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Santa Paula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Paula does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Santa Paula versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Paula may include: Brawley, Oakdale, and Calexico.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z