Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Paula to South Pasadena
This post compares Santa Paula, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Santa Paula (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,344 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $36,718 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $928,500 |
White | 85% | 54% |
Black | 0% | 3% |
Asian | 1% | 29% |
With Kids | 43% | 34% |
Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Paula or South Pasadena?
A: Santa Paula has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 30344 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Paula or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Santa Paula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Paula or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Santa Paula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Santa Paula versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Paula may include: Brawley, Oakdale, and Calexico.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z