Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Paula to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Santa Paula, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Paula (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,344 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $36,718 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $374,600 |
| White | 85% | 81% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 3% |
| With Kids | 43% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Paula or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Santa Paula has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 30344 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Paula or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Santa Paula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Paula or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Santa Paula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Santa Paula versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Paula may include: Brawley, Oakdale, and Calexico.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z