Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Paula to San Bruno
This post compares Santa Paula, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Paula (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,344 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $36,718 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $754,700 |
| White | 85% | 49% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 28% |
| With Kids | 43% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Paula or San Bruno?
A: Santa Paula has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 30344 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Paula or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Santa Paula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Paula or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Santa Paula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Paula does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Santa Paula versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Paula may include: Brawley, Oakdale, and Calexico.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z