Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Paula to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Santa Paula, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Paula (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,344 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $36,718 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $444,200 |
| White | 85% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 1% | 13% |
| With Kids | 43% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Paula or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Santa Paula has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 30344 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Paula or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Santa Paula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Paula or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Santa Paula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Paula does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Santa Paula versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Paula may include: Brawley, Oakdale, and Calexico.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z