Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Paula to Pico Rivera
This post compares Santa Paula, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Paula (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,344 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $36,718 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $380,200 |
| White | 85% | 55% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 1% | 3% |
| With Kids | 43% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 36 |
| Rentals | 45% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Paula or Pico Rivera?
A: Santa Paula has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 30344 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Paula or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Santa Paula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Paula or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Santa Paula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Paula does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Santa Paula versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Paula may include: Brawley, Oakdale, and Calexico.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z