Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Paula to Chico
This post compares Santa Paula, California to Chico, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Paula (city) | Chico (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,344 | 90,660 |
| Income (median) | $36,718 | $43,253 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $286,700 |
| White | 85% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 4% |
| With Kids | 43% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 29 |
| Rentals | 45% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Paula or Chico?
A: Santa Paula has a much smaller population count than Chico: 30344 compared with 90660 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Paula or in Chico?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Santa Paula.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Paula or Chico?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Santa Paula.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chico does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Santa Paula versus 55% for Chico.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Paula may include: Brawley, Oakdale, and Calexico.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z