Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Monica to South San Francisco
This post compares Santa Monica, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Monica (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92,495 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $79,865 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,168,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 76% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 10% | 39% |
| With Kids | 16% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 72% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Monica or South San Francisco?
A: Santa Monica has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 92495 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Monica or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Santa Monica.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Monica or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Santa Monica.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Monica does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 72% for Santa Monica versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Monica may include: Santa-Barbara, Monterey, and West-Hollywood.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z