Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Clara to South San Francisco
This post compares Santa Clara, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Clara (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 124,635 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $80,277 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $831,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 42% | 33% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 41% | 39% |
| With Kids | 33% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 56% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Clara or South San Francisco?
A: Santa Clara has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 124635 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Clara or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Santa Clara.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Clara or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Santa Clara.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Clara does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Santa Clara versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Clara may include: Irvine, Sunnyvale, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z