Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Barbara to South San Francisco
This post compares Santa Barbara, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Barbara (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,443 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $49,574 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $934,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 77% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 23% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 59% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Barbara or South San Francisco?
A: Santa Barbara has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 91443 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Barbara or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Santa Barbara.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Barbara or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Santa Barbara.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Barbara does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 59% for Santa Barbara versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Barbara may include: Monterey, Costa-Mesa, and Burbank.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z