Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Ana to South San Francisco
This post compares Santa Ana, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Ana (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 334,493 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $30,219 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $421,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 44% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 39% |
| With Kids | 51% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Ana or South San Francisco?
A: Santa Ana has a much larger population count than South San Francisco: 334493 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Ana or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Santa Ana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Ana or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Santa Ana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Ana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Santa Ana versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Ana may include: Salinas, Ontario, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z