Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Ana to San Bruno
This post compares Santa Ana, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Ana (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 334,493 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $30,219 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $421,600 | $754,700 |
| White | 44% | 49% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 28% |
| With Kids | 51% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Ana or San Bruno?
A: Santa Ana has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 334493 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Ana or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Santa Ana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Ana or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Santa Ana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Ana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Santa Ana versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Ana may include: Salinas, Ontario, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z