Compare-Cities.com
Compare Santa Ana to Beverly Hills
This post compares Santa Ana, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Santa Ana (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 334,493 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $30,219 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $421,600 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 44% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 9% |
| With Kids | 51% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 43 |
| Rentals | 54% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Santa Ana or Beverly Hills?
A: Santa Ana has a much larger population count than Beverly Hills: 334493 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Santa Ana or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Santa Ana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Santa Ana or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Santa Ana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Santa Ana versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Santa Ana may include: Salinas, Ontario, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z