Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to South San Francisco
This post compares Sanger, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 77% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 39% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 42% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or South San Francisco?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 24883 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z