Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to South Pasadena
This post compares Sanger, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $928,500 |
| White | 77% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 2% | 29% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 42% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or South Pasadena?
A: Sanger has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 24883 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z