Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to South El Monte
This post compares Sanger, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $389,400 |
| White | 77% | 59% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 2% | 14% |
| With Kids | 49% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 42% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or South El Monte?
A: Sanger has a similar population count than South El Monte: 24883 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z