Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to San Francisco
This post compares Sanger, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Sanger (city) | San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,883 | 864,263 |
Income (median) | $35,793 | $74,841 |
Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $927,400 |
White | 77% | 47% |
Black | 0% | 5% |
Asian | 2% | 34% |
With Kids | 49% | 18% |
Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
Rentals | 42% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or San Francisco?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 24883 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z