Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to San Bruno
This post compares Sanger, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $754,700 |
| White | 77% | 49% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 28% |
| With Kids | 49% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 42% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or San Bruno?
A: Sanger has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 24883 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z