Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Riverside
This post compares Sanger, California to Riverside, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Sanger (city) | Riverside (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,883 | 321,570 |
Income (median) | $35,793 | $41,576 |
Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $319,200 |
White | 77% | 61% |
Black | 0% | 6% |
Asian | 2% | 7% |
With Kids | 49% | 40% |
Age (median) | 32 | 31 |
Rentals | 42% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Riverside?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Riverside: 24883 compared with 321570 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Riverside?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Riverside?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 45% for Riverside.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z