Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Riverbank
This post compares Sanger, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $247,200 |
| White | 77% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 49% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 42% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Riverbank?
A: Sanger has a similar population count than Riverbank: 24883 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z