Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Sanger, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Sanger (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,883 | 174,573 |
Income (median) | $35,793 | $56,814 |
Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $444,200 |
White | 77% | 62% |
Black | 0% | 9% |
Asian | 2% | 13% |
With Kids | 49% | 39% |
Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
Rentals | 42% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 24883 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z