Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Pleasanton
This post compares Sanger, California to Pleasanton, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Pleasanton (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 79,341 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $102,827 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $879,800 |
| White | 77% | 59% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 31% |
| With Kids | 49% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 42 |
| Rentals | 42% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Pleasanton?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Pleasanton: 24883 compared with 79341 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Pleasanton?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Pleasanton?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 30% for Pleasanton.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z