Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Sanger, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $633,400 |
| White | 77% | 75% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 13% |
| With Kids | 49% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 42% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Pleasant Hill?
A: Sanger has a smaller population count than Pleasant Hill: 24883 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z