Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Pico Rivera
This post compares Sanger, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $380,200 |
| White | 77% | 55% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 2% | 3% |
| With Kids | 49% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 36 |
| Rentals | 42% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Pico Rivera?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 24883 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z