Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Palm Springs
This post compares Sanger, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $340,600 |
| White | 77% | 83% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 49% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 54 |
| Rentals | 42% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Palm Springs?
A: Sanger has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 24883 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z