Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Long Beach
This post compares Sanger, California to Long Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Long Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 470,489 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $46,054 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $476,400 |
| White | 77% | 52% |
| Black | 0% | 12% |
| Asian | 2% | 13% |
| With Kids | 49% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 42% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Long Beach?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Long Beach: 24883 compared with 470489 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Long Beach?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Long Beach?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 60% for Long Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z