Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Lancaster
This post compares Sanger, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $213,100 |
| White | 77% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 21% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 49% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 42% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Lancaster?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 24883 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z