Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Laguna Hills
This post compares Sanger, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $649,700 |
| White | 77% | 69% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 14% |
| With Kids | 49% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 41 |
| Rentals | 42% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Laguna Hills?
A: Sanger has a similar population count than Laguna Hills: 24883 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z