Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Fairfield
This post compares Sanger, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Sanger (city) | Fairfield (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,883 | 112,790 |
Income (median) | $35,793 | $51,969 |
Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $341,500 |
White | 77% | 46% |
Black | 0% | 14% |
Asian | 2% | 17% |
With Kids | 49% | 41% |
Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
Rentals | 42% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Fairfield?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Fairfield: 24883 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z